Submitted by Oliver Nowalski
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1138d/1138dc23be88bdb11a6b80567007e082607b6ab5" alt=""
A median or pedestrian refuge was recently built in Mt. Auburn Street in Cambridge, MA. It is specifically located next to the intersection between Mt. Auburn Street and a small one way street called Brewer St.
In the case of the median refuge in study, it helps everyone to cross the street. No matter if people are young, old or with mobility disabilities, this refuge provides safety and an easier way of crossing the street for everyone. This street is a two way street with one lane going in each direction. Although pedestrians that walk at a regular speed should not have trouble crossing it, the median refuge makes the crossing a lot easier. On the other hand, the refuge has been made in a way that it narrows the street as it can be seen in the picture. This makes the cars travel slower, contributing to an even safer crosswalk for the pedestrians.
Walking through Mt. Auburn Street, especifically around the area of the pedestrian refuge, on one side of the street we encounter several houses and on the other a more comercial area. The comercial area has a liquor store that seemed to have several customers the moment the pictures were taken. In the five minutes that I was present at this median refuge, I saw several pedestrians using the refuge to cross from the residential side of the street to the comercial side. While this happened, it was possible to see how the cars lowered their speeds as they saw the pedestrians crossing. Likewise,the pedestrians looked calm while crossing the street since it required a very small effort of their part to find two separate small gaps in traffic. This means that the pedestrian refugee is achieving its goal of providing an easy and safe way to cross Mt. Auburn St.
This pedestrian refuge is a success due to the design it has. As one can see in the pictures, the street narrows at the crosswalk, which makes the cars slow down. In addition, by having plants and flowers, as well as two signs that tell the cars that there is a slight swerve on the street, the cars can lower their speeds before getting to the crosswalk. Furthermore, there is a big yellow sign with a pedestrian crossing that alerts the drivers of the crosswalk and that the pedestrians have the right of way.
The only "problem" that this median refuge has is that the street is very narrow, so people can cross easily at different points of the street. There is no way of correcting this since the street has only one lane in each direction. As seen in the picture, people can easily cross the street without using the refuge. Even though this could be considered as a problem, it is not. While I saw around 10 people use the pedestrian refuge in the five minutes I was present in the area, only one person crossed the street at another point. It is better to have the refugee for the vast majority of people to use, than to not have it because 1 out of 10 people decide that it is easier to cross the street without the help of the refuge.
In general, harmony is present between the actual use, intended use and design of this pedestrian refuge.
In general, harmony is present between the actual use, intended use and design of this pedestrian refuge.
While it may the case that we "usually" install median refuges on wide (multilane) streets, our "usual" way of managing streets is nothing to be proud of or continue. We routinely allow our streets to become barriers to pedestrians, in sharp contrast to northern European practice in which median refuges are required if a road has more than 3 lanes, and are common on 2-lane roads. As you observed, plenty of "regular" people were enjoying the crossing. This median refuge wasn't installed to help one or another subset of the population; it was done to help everybody.
ReplyDelete